<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google provides &#8220;Aggregate&#8221; search trends to government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.imasuper.com/160/technology/google-provides-aggregate-search-trends-to-government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.imasuper.com/160/technology/google-provides-aggregate-search-trends-to-government/</link>
	<description>A super hero. With no powers. Or motivation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:26:31 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: imasuper</title>
		<link>http://www.imasuper.com/160/technology/google-provides-aggregate-search-trends-to-government/comment-page-1/#comment-556</link>
		<dc:creator>imasuper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 15:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imasuper.com/?p=160#comment-556</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know that it&#039;s &quot;very likely&quot; that all or most search terms would contain personally identifiable information, but it is likely that at least a small portion of a segment of aggregate data would.

Reading my article back to myself, I must say the concept of using search data to attempt to chart and track flu symptoms is a neat idea, and in a &quot;go society!&quot; kind of way, it&#039;s really great. But again, Google is a dangerous company to be doing things like this, for the reasons above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know that it&#8217;s &#8220;very likely&#8221; that all or most search terms would contain personally identifiable information, but it is likely that at least a small portion of a segment of aggregate data would.</p>
<p>Reading my article back to myself, I must say the concept of using search data to attempt to chart and track flu symptoms is a neat idea, and in a &#8220;go society!&#8221; kind of way, it&#8217;s really great. But again, Google is a dangerous company to be doing things like this, for the reasons above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.imasuper.com/160/technology/google-provides-aggregate-search-trends-to-government/comment-page-1/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 05:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imasuper.com/?p=160#comment-554</guid>
		<description>&quot;Anonymized&quot; data cannot be anonymous. People often search for their own name or address (ever get directions from Google Maps?). So even if they replace your name with a number, your search terms would very likely have identifying information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Anonymized&#8221; data cannot be anonymous. People often search for their own name or address (ever get directions from Google Maps?). So even if they replace your name with a number, your search terms would very likely have identifying information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
