<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technology Holy Wars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.imasuper.com/285/technology/technology-holy-wars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.imasuper.com/285/technology/technology-holy-wars/</link>
	<description>A super hero. With no powers. Or motivation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:04:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: roforofo</title>
		<link>http://www.imasuper.com/285/technology/technology-holy-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-31482</link>
		<dc:creator>roforofo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 17:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imasuper.com/?p=285#comment-31482</guid>
		<description>there goes the holy wars still :) blood and ... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there goes the holy wars still <img src='http://www.imasuper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  blood and &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priv A. See</title>
		<link>http://www.imasuper.com/285/technology/technology-holy-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-1149</link>
		<dc:creator>Priv A. See</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imasuper.com/?p=285#comment-1149</guid>
		<description>You have some good points, on the flip side though my personal preference has leaned more towards Chrome for the very reasons you listed. The simplicity, cleanliness and lack of settings has made Chrome the best browser for me. ;) 
 
To each his own ah? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have some good points, on the flip side though my personal preference has leaned more towards Chrome for the very reasons you listed. The simplicity, cleanliness and lack of settings has made Chrome the best browser for me. <img src='http://www.imasuper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>To each his own ah?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveC</title>
		<link>http://www.imasuper.com/285/technology/technology-holy-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-1134</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imasuper.com/?p=285#comment-1134</guid>
		<description>Aside from the PS, the post is a useful observation. The question is what the niche strengths and weaknesses are for each technology.  
 
Mac and Firefox definitely have their strengths. From limited experience, Mac OSX is more stable than Vista, and certainly a LOT of the &quot;creative&quot; industry uses Macs heavilly. If you are working with them, Just using Mac may well save enough interaction overhead to justify the high cost of Mac hardware.  
 
IE may have strengths over Firefox, but as far as customizing settings convenience, especially related to maintaining privacy, Firefox has worked out much better for me. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aside from the PS, the post is a useful observation. The question is what the niche strengths and weaknesses are for each technology. </p>
<p>Mac and Firefox definitely have their strengths. From limited experience, Mac OSX is more stable than Vista, and certainly a LOT of the &quot;creative&quot; industry uses Macs heavilly. If you are working with them, Just using Mac may well save enough interaction overhead to justify the high cost of Mac hardware. </p>
<p>IE may have strengths over Firefox, but as far as customizing settings convenience, especially related to maintaining privacy, Firefox has worked out much better for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

